Skip to main content
JDRS · Open access journal

Original Article · Open access

Ankle arthrodesis with arthroscopic fibular osteotomy for varus ankle arthritis

PDF Cite this article

Mehmet Orçun Akkurt

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Sincan Research and Training Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0003-4935-0143

Batuhan Bahadir

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0002-4651-1063

Nurettin Mantı

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0002-1607-0420

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes of a novel, single-stage arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis employing complete arthroscopic fibular osteotomy in patients exhibiting significant varus malalignment (≥ 10°) and severe osteoarthritis (OA) and to compare these results with those of patients undergoing arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis with mild deformity.

Patients and methods: Between August 2018 and May 2023, a total of 49 patients (23 males, 26 females; mean age: 50.00 ± 14.72 years; range, 21 to 71 years) who underwent arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis for tibiotalar arthrosis with a minimum postoperative follow-up of two years were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups: Group A (n = 20) consisted of end-stage tibiotalar OA patients with ≥ 10° varus alignment and Group B (n = 29) consisted of those with < 10° varus alignment. An arthroscopic fibular osteotomy at the level of ankle joint was performed using an osteotome introduced through the anteromedial portal in Group A, resulting in fibula shortening equivalent to the thickness of the osteotome. Fixation in both groups was achieved using two or three 6.5-mm cannulated screws. Outcomes were evaluated utilizing the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, the 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36), and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Score (AOFAS) at baseline and at three, six, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of age, sex, or the affected sides between the groups (p = 0.210, p = 0.348, and p = 0.906, respectively). All the patients had Takakura Stage IIIB and IV ankle OA with a trauma-related etiology. The mean duration of the operation was 85.50 ± 9.72 min in Group A which included arthroscopic fibular osteotomy and 57.59 ± 5.61 min in Group B, indicating a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). The mean fusion times and complication rates were comparable between the groups (p = 0.064 and p = 1.000, respectively). All patients demonstrated significant and consistent improvements in VAS, AOFAS, and SF-36 scores, compared to baseline (p < 0.001). At three months, the VAS scores in Group A were significantly higher (p = 0.020); however, later evaluations showed comparable scores between the groups. Group B exhibited significantly higher AOFAS scores at three, six, and 24 months. The SF-36 scores indicated no significant differences between the groups in any time points in the postoperative period.

Conclusion: This study provides the novel, initial clinical evidence for a single-stage arthroscopic procedure which incorporates complete arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis and arthroscopic fibular osteotomy in severe varus deformities. It can be effectively used with similar fusion and recovery times, by eliminating mechanical obstruction caused by the fibula in varus OA without necessitating additional surgical incisions.

Valderrabano V, Horisberger M, Russell I, Dougall H, Hintermann B. Etiology of ankle osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:1800-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008- 0543-6.

Takakura Y, Takaoka T, Tanaka Y, Yajima H, Tamai S. Results of opening-wedge osteotomy for the treatment of a post-traumatic varus deformity of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:213-8. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199802000- 00008.

Thomas RH, Daniels TR. Ankle arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:923-36. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200305000-00026.

Monroe MT, Beals TC, Manoli A 2nd. Clinical outcome of arthrodesis of the ankle using rigid internal fixation with cancellous screws. Foot Ankle Int 1999;20:227-31. doi: 10.1177/107110079902000404.

Herrera-Pérez M, González-Martín D, Vallejo-Márquez M, Godoy-Santos AL, Valderrabano V, Tejero S. Ankle osteoarthritis aetiology. J Clin Med 2021;10:4489. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194489.

Liang JQ, Wang JH, Zhang Y, Wen XD, Liu PL, Liang XJ, et al. Fibular osteotomy is helpful for talar reduction in the treatment of varus ankle osteoarthritis with supramalleolar osteotomy. J Orthop Surg Res 2021;16:575. doi: 10.1186/ s13018-021-02732-8.

Kurokawa H, Taniguchi A, Ueno Y, Miyamoto T, Tanaka Y. Risk factors for the progression of varus ankle osteoarthritis. Foot Ankle Orthop 2023;8:24730114231178763. doi: 10.1177/24730114231178763.

Barg A, Pagenstert GI, Hügle T, Gloyer M, Wiewiorski M, Henninger HB, et al. Ankle osteoarthritis: Etiology, diagnostics, and classification. Foot Ankle Clin 2013;18:411- 26. doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2013.06.001.

Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Kumai T, Tamai S. Low tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the ankle. Results of a new operation in 18 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995;77:50-4.

Schenk K, Lieske S, John M, Franke K, Mouly S, Lizee E, et al. Prospective study of a cementless, mobile-bearing, third generation total ankle prosthesis. Foot Ankle Int 2011;32:755-63. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2011.0755.

Hennessy C, Abram S, Loizou C, Brown R, Sharp B, Kendal A. Long-term consequences of total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle fusion: a 25-year national population study of 41,000 patients. Orthop Procs 2025;107-B(Supp_1):4-4. doi:10.1302/1358-992X.2025.1.004

Tanaka Y, Takakura Y, Hayashi K, Taniguchi A, Kumai T, Sugimoto K. Low tibial osteotomy for varus-type osteoarthritis of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88:909- 13. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B7.17325.

Daniels TR, Younger AS, Penner M, Wing K, Dryden PJ, Wong H, et al. Intermediate-term results of total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis: A COFAS multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96:135-42. doi: 10.2106/ JBJS.L.01597.

Chen B, Tan F, Li X. An assessment of ankle function, oxidative damage, and Inflammatory factor levels in minimally invasive ankle joint fusion surgery for the treatment of traumatic ankle osteoarthritis. Int J Morphol 2024;42:462–9.

Bai Z, Yang Y, Chen S, Dong Y, Cao X, Qin W, et al. Clinical effectiveness of arthroscopic vs open ankle arthrodesis for advanced ankle arthritis: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021;100:e24998. doi: 10.1097/ MD.0000000000024998.

Gutteck N, Delank KS, Schilde S. Comparative results of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis vs. open arthrodesis in patients with diabetes-associated Charcot NeuroArthropathy. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2023;33:3577-84. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03592-0.

Bernasconi A, Mehdi N, Lintz F. Fibular intra-articular resection during arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: The surgical technique. Arthrosc Tech 2017;6:e1865-70. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.07.007.

Harada S, Teramoto T, Takaki M, Asahara T, Katoh N, Takenaka N, et al. Radiological assessments and clinical results of intra-articular osteotomy for traumatic osteoarthritis of the ankle. Injury 2021;52:3516-27. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.08.022.

Harrington KD. Degenerative arthritis of the ankle secondary to long-standing lateral ligament instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1979;61:354-61.

Liu N, Zhang M, Feng SM, Bi YL, Zhai HW, Meng Q. Effect of hip strategy-based motion control training on walking function restoration after ankle joint injury. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2024;35:54-61. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.1277.

Kim H, Choi J, Jang CY, Lee JW, Kim S, Han SH. Automatic grading of ankle osteoarthritis based on takakura staging system: a deep learning- based approach. Foot Ankle Orthop 2019;4. doi: 10.1177/2473011419S00246.

Trajkovski T, Pinsker E, Cadden A, Daniels T. Outcomes of ankle arthroplasty with preoperative coronal-plane varus deformity of 10° or greater. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013;95:1382-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00797.

Maenohara Y, Taniguchi A, Tomiwa K, Tsuboyama D, Kurokawa H, Kumai T, et al. Outcomes of bilateral vs unilateral ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 2018;39:530-4. doi: 10.1177/1071100717749505.

Lawton CD, Butler BA, Dekker RG 2nd, Prescott A, Kadakia AR. Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis-a comparison of outcomes over the last decade. J Orthop Surg Res 2017;12:76. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0576-1.

Xu Y, Li XC, Guo CJ, Xu XY. Intra-articular opening osteotomy combined with lateral ligament reconstruction for varus ankle arthritis. J Orthop Surg Res 2021;16:7. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02143-1.

Patel S, Baker L, Perez J, Vulcano E, Kaplan J, Aiyer A. Risk factors for nonunion following ankle arthrodesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Foot Ankle Spec 2023;16:60-77. doi: 10.1177/1938640021998493.

Thordarson DB, Motamed S, Hedman T, Ebramzadeh E, Bakshian S. The effect of fibular malreduction on contact pressures in an ankle fracture malunion model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:1809-15. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199712000-00006.

Zanolli DH, Nunley JA 2nd, Easley ME. Subtalar fusion rate in patients with previous ipsilateral ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 2015;36:1025-8. doi: 10.1177/1071100715584014.

Jennison T, Dalgleish J, Taher S, Chadwick C, Blundell C, Davies M, et al. Subtalar arthrodesis union rates with and without adjacent ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 2022;43:1295-9. doi: 10.1177/10711007221110873.

Collman DR, Kaas MH, Schuberth JM. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: Factors influencing union in 39 consecutive patients. Foot Ankle Int 2006;27:1079-85. doi: 10.1177/107110070602701214.

Bloch B, Srinivasan S, Mangwani J. Current concepts in the management of ankle osteoarthritis: A systematic review. J Foot Ankle Surg 2015;54:932-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.12.042.

Honnenahalli Chandrappa M, Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S. Ankle arthrodesis-open versus arthroscopic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2017;8:S71- 7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.03.010.

Park JJ, Son WS, Woo IH, Park CH. Combined transfibular and anterior approaches increase union rate and decrease non-weight-bearing periods in ankle arthrodesis: Combined approaches in ankle arthrodesis. J Clin Med 2021;10:5915. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245915.

Winson IG, Robinson DE, Allen PE. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:343-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.87b3.15756.

Smith R, Wood PL. Arthrodesis of the ankle in the presence of a large deformity in the coronal plane. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89:615-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B5.18109.

Verhelst MP, Mulier JC, Hoogmartens MJ, Spaas F. Arthrodesis of the ankle joint with complete removal of the distal part of the fibula: Experience with the transfibular approach and three different types of fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976;(118):93-9.

Yasui Y, Hannon CP, Seow D, Kennedy JG. Ankle arthrodesis: A systematic approach and review of the literature. World J Orthop 2016;7:700-8. doi: 10.5312/wjo. v7.i11.700.

Mehdi N, Bernasconi A, Laborde J, Lintz F. An original fibular shortening osteotomy technique in tibiotalar arthrodesis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2017;103:717-20. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.03.023.

de Leeuw PA, Hendrickx RP, van Dijk CN, Stufkens SS, Kerkhoffs GM. Midterm results of posterior arthroscopic ankle fusion. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016;24:1326-31. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3975-z.

Marsh A, Kooner S, Conlin C, Hussain R, Yeganeh KM, Lau J. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: a review of current concepts and technique. Tech Foot Ankle Surg 2020;19:19-25.

Fragomen AT, Borst E, Schachter L, Lyman S, Rozbruch SR. Complex ankle arthrodesis using the Ilizarov method yields high rate of fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470:2864-73. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2470-9.

Chalayon O, Wang B, Blankenhorn B, Jackson JB 3rd, Beals T, Nickisch F, et al. Factors affecting the outcomes of uncomplicated primary open ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 2015;36:1170-9. doi: 10.1177/1071100715587045.

Cottino U, Collo G, Morino L, Cosentino A, Gallina V, Deregibus M, et al. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis: A review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2012;5:151-5. doi: 10.1007/s12178-012-9119-x.

Colman AB, Pomeroy GC. Transfibular ankle arthrodesis with rigid internal fixation: An assessment of outcome. Foot Ankle Int 2007;28:303-7. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2007.0303.

Patel RA, Wilson RF, Patel PA, Palmer RM. The effect of smoking on bone healing: A systematic review. Bone Joint Res 2013;2:102-11. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.26.2000142.

Loder RT. The influence of diabetes mellitus on the healing of closed fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988;(232):210-6.

Semenistyy AA, Kehayov RI. Ankle arthrodesis through minimally-invasive transfibular approach: A new surgical technique. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2024;34:2483-92. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-03950-6.

Coester LM, Saltzman CL, Leupold J, Pontarelli W. Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for posttraumatic arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83:219-28. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200102000-00009.

Declarations

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, writingoriginal draft preparation: M.O.A., B.B.; Methodology: M.O.A., N.M.; Data curation: B.B., N.M.; Writing-review and editing: N.M., B.B.; Supervision: M.O.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Financial Disclosure

The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.

Data Sharing Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

AI Disclosure

The authors declare that artificial intelligence (AI) tools were not used, or were used solely for language editing, and had no role in data analysis, interpretation, or the formulation of conclusions. All scientific content, data interpretation, and conclusions are the sole responsibility of the authors. The authors further confirm that AI tools were not used to generate, fabricate, or ‘hallucinate’ references, and that all references have been carefully verified for accuracy.