Original Article · Open access
Clinical efficacy of robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical efficacy of robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty (R-THA) versus conventional total hip arthroplasty (C-THA) for the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).
Materials and methods: Eligible articles published until May 2025 were searched from the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Springer. Search terms included “robot-assisted”, “developmental dysplasia of the hip”, “total hip arthroplasty”, using mean differences (MDs) and risk differences (RDs) as combined variables, and selecting 95% as the confidence interval (CI).
Results: Seven clinical studies with a total of 876 patients were finally included in this study. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of cup inclination (MD=0.07; 95% CI: –0.95 ~ 1.10; p=0.89), cup anteversion (MD=–4.02; 95% CI: –9.59 ~ 1.55; p=0.16), intraoperative bleeding (MD=11.25; 95% CI: –56.02 ~ 78.52; p=0.74), operative time (MD=3.03; 95% CI: –15.66 ~ 21.72; p=0.75), postoperative complications (dislocation [RD=–0.01; 95% CI: –0.03 ~ 0.01; p=0.26], deep infection [RD=0.01; 95% CI: –0.01 ~ 0.02; p=0.37] and nerve injury [RD=0.01; 95% CI: –0.01 ~ 0.03; p=0.56], revision/reoperation [RD=–0.00; 95% CI: –0.03 ~ 0.03; p=1.00], and absolute vertical distance of center of rotation [COR] [MD=–0.50; 95% CI: –1.07 ~ 0.06; p=0.08]). However, compared to the C-THA group, the R-THA group showed significantly higher Harris Hip Score (HHS) (MD=2.17, 95% CI: 0.11 ~ 4.22, p=0.04) and more accurate placement of the horizontal COR (MD=–0.77; 95% CI: –1.21 ~ –0.32; p=0.0008).
Conclusion: In the R-THA group, the accuracy of horizontal placement of the COR was moderately improved, and the postoperative HHS was higher than that in the C-THA group, although such differences might not be obviously perceived by patients. Additionally, no significant differences were found between the two groups in other surgery-related parameters and safety.
* These authors contributed equally to this work.
Declarations
Author Contributions
Conception and design of the study: H.T.Y., Y.X.Z., T.Y., X.F., L.W., J.L.; Study selection, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment of each included study (performed independently): H.T.Y., Y.X.Z., T.Y.; Manuscript preparation: H.T.Y., Y.X.Z., T.Y., J.L.; Equal contribution: H.T.Y., Y.X.Z., T.Y.; Final approval of the article: All authors.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Financial Disclosure
The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.
Data Sharing Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- Wyles CC, Heidenreich MJ, Jeng J, Larson DR, Trousdale RT, Sierra RJ. The John Charnley Award: redefining the natural history of osteoarthritis in patients with hip dysplasia and impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017;475:336-350. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4815-2.
- Harsanyi S, Zamborsky R, Krajciova L, Kokavec M, Danisovic L. Developmental dysplasia of the hip: A review of etiopathogenesis, risk factors, and genetic aspects. Medicina (Kaunas) 2020;56:153. DOI: 10.3390/medicina56040153.
- Gkiatas I, Boptsi A, Tserga D, Gelalis I, Kosmas D, Pakos E. Developmental dysplasia of the hip: A systematic literature review of the genes related with its occurrence. EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:595-601. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.190006.
- Tolunay T, Baymurat AC, Çalta MŞ, Atalar H. Cakirgil method in the surgical treatment of older children with developmental dysplasia of the hip: Mid-term follow-up results of 17 hips and literature review. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2024;35:202-8. DOI: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.1510.
- Biedermann R, Tonin A, Krismer M, Rachbauer F, Eibl G, Stöckl B. Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: The effect of orientation of the acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:762-9. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B6.14745.
- Little NJ, Busch CA, Gallagher JA, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Acetabular polyethylene wear and acetabular inclination and femoral offset. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:2895-900. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-0845-3.
- Zeng Y, Lai OJ, Shen B, Yang J, Zhou ZK, Kang PD, et al. Three-dimensional computerized preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty with high-riding dislocation developmental dysplasia of the hip. Orthop Surg 2014;6:95- 102. DOI: 10.1111/os.12099.
- Kanawade V, Dorr LD, Banks SA, Zhang Z, Wan Z. Precision of robotic guided instrumentation for acetabular component positioning. J Arthroplasty 2015;30:392-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.021.
- El Bitar YF, Jackson TJ, Lindner D, Botser IB, Stake CE, Domb BG. Predictive value of robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2015;38:e31-7. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20150105-57.
- Papachristou GC, Pappa E, Chytas D, Masouros PT, Nikolaou VS. Total hip replacement in developmental hip dysplasia: A narrative review. Cureus 2021;13:e14763. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.14763.
- Chai W, Xu C, Guo RW, Kong XP, Fu J, Tang PF, et al. Does robotic-assisted computer navigation improve acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty for Crowe III/IV hip dysplasia? A propensity score case-match analysis. Int Orthop 2022;46:769-77. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-05232-w.
- Konishi T, Sato T, Hamai S, Kawahara S, Hara D, Nakashima Y. Robotic arm-assisted system ımproved accuracy of cup position and orientation in cementless total hip arthroplasty for dysplastic hips: A comparison among groups with manual placement, computed tomography-based navigation, and robotic surgery. Arthroplast Today 2024;28:101461. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101461.
- Sato K, Sato A, Okuda N, Masaaki M, Koga H. A propensity score-matched comparison between Mako robotic arm-assisted system and conventional technique in total hip arthroplasty for patients with osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023;143:2755-61. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04524-z.
- Shi H, Yu R, Pu L, Qi B, Meng C, Ren J, et al. Application and exploration of total hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip assisted by full-process robotics. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2025;26:225. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08460-y.PMID:40050806;PMCID:PMC11884115.
- Zhang S, Ma M, Kong X, Zhou Y, Chen J, Chai W. Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip. Int Orthop 2024;48:1189- 99. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-024-06115-6.
- Zhou Y, Shao H, Huang Y, Deng W, Yang D, Bian T. Does robotic assisted technology improve the accuracy of acetabular component positioning in patients with DDH? J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2021;29:23094990211025325. DOI: 10.1177/23094990211025325.
- Zora H, Bayrak G, Bilgen ÖF. Robotically assisted vs. manual total hip arthroplasty in developmental hip dysplasia: A comparative analysis of radiological and functional outcomes. J Clin Med 2025;14:509. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020509.
- Greber EM, Pelt CE, Gililland JM, Anderson MB, Erickson JA, Peters CL. Challenges in total hip arthroplasty in the setting of developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Arthroplasty 2017;32:S38-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.024.
- Ando W, Takao M, Hamada H, Uemura K, Sugano N. Comparison of the accuracy of the cup position and orientation in total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip between the Mako robotic arm-assisted system and computed tomography-based navigation. Int Orthop 2021;45:1719-25. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-05015-3.
- Bensa A, Pagliazzi G, Miele A, Schiavon G, Cuzzolin M, Filardo G. Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty provides greater implant placement accuracy and lower complication rates, but not superior clinical results compared to the conventional manual approach: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 2025;40:1921-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.12.014.
- Kaku N, Tabata T, Tagomori H, Abe T, Tsumura H. The mechanical effects of cup inclination and anteversion angle on the bearing surface. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2018;28:65-70. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-017-2025-6.
- Seagrave KG, Troelsen A, Malchau H, Husted H, Gromov K. Acetabular cup position and risk of dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 2017;88:10-7. DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1251255.
- Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1978;60:217-20.
- Sugano N, Takao M, Sakai T, Nishii T, Miki H. Does CT-based navigation improve the long-term survival in ceramic-onceramic THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012;470:3054-9. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2378-4.
- Rogers BA, Garbedian S, Kuchinad RA, Backstein D, Safir O, Gross AE. Total hip arthroplasty for adult hip dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012;94:1809-21. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00779.
- Kort N, Stirling P, Pilot P, Müller JH. Clinical and surgical outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional total hip arthroplasty: A systematic overview of meta-analyses. EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:1157-65. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200121.
- Kumar V, Patel S, Baburaj V, Rajnish RK, Aggarwal S. Does robotic-assisted surgery improve outcomes of total hip arthroplasty compared to manual technique? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Postgrad Med J 2023;99:375-83. DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2021-141135.
- Han PF, Chen CL, Zhang ZL, Han YC, Wei L, Li PC, et al. Robotics-assisted versus conventional manual approaches for total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Int J Med Robot 2019;15:e1990. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1990.
- Singh JA, Schleck C, Harmsen S, Lewallen D. Clinically important improvement thresholds for Harris Hip Score and its ability to predict revision risk after primary total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016;17:256. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1106-8.
- Guo R, Chen JY, Zhang G, Zhou Y, Chen J, Chai W. Calculation method to predict postoperative limb length in patients undergoing THA following developmental dysplasia of hips. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019;20:513. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2903-7.
- Fansur M, Yurdi NA, Stoewe R. The intraoperative use of a calliper predicts leg length and offset after total hip arthroplasty. Component subsidence influences the leg length. J Orthop Surg Res 2021;16:424. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02559-3.
- Lim PL, Goh GS, Bedair HS, Melnic CM. Robotic versus manual total hip arthroplasty: A marginal time-driven activity-based costing analysis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2025 Jun 17. [Online ahead of print] DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01498.
- Kirchner GJ, Lieber AM, Haislup B, Kerbel YE, Moretti VM. The cost of robot-assisted total hip arthroplasty: Comparing safety and hospital charges to conventional total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2021;29:609- 15. DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00715.
