Skip to main content
JDRS · Open access journal
Joint Diseases and
Related Surgery
Online manuscript submissionSubmit a manuscript e-ISSN 2687-4792

Original Article · Open access

Comparative biomechanical evaluation of medial support plating in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis

PDF Cite this article

Mahmut Kalem

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medicine Faculty of Ankara University, Ankara, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0002-8598-0938

Malik Kısmet

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medicine Faculty of Ankara University, Ankara, Türkiye

ORCID: 0009-0009-7861-3409

Mehmet Batu Ertan

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medicine Faculty of Atılım University, Ankara, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0001-6757-9967

Ercan Şahin

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medicine Faculty of Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0003-0491-9156

Hakan Kocaoğlu

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Medicine Faculty of Ankara University, Ankara, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0002-1421-3555

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the biomechanical contribution of medial support plating compared to isolated screws and to determine the impact of plate design (one-third tubular vs. mini-plate) and distal screw configuration (unicortical vs. bicortical) on construct stability.

Materials and methods: Five finite element models were analyzed in this study: three cannulated screws (CS) alone (control), and CS augmented with either a one-third tubular plate or a 2.4-mm mini-plate. For the plated models, the distal fragment was fixed using either unicortical or bicortical screws to isolate the effect of cortical purchase. A 1,400 N axial load was applied to simulate the single-leg stance phase of gait. Fracture micromotion, femoral head displacement, and von Mises stress distribution were recorded.

Results: Medial support plating substantially improved construct stability compared to screws alone, reducing femoral head displacement and fracture gap movement. Notably, no significant biomechanical differences were observed between unicortical and bicortical fixation configurations for either plate type. Both the one-third tubular plate and the 2.4-mm mini-plate provided equivalent rigidity. Although mini-plates exhibited higher internal stress concentrations, values remained below the yield strength of the material.

Conclusion: Bicortical fixation provided no additional mechanical advantage over unicortical fixation in improving construct stability or reducing implant stress. Therefore, the primary determinant of stability is the medial buttress effect itself; once this is established, neither the plate profile nor the screw length significantly alters the biomechanical outcome, suggesting that unicortical fixation with low-profile plates provides sufficient mechanical stability.

Declarations

Author Contributions

M.K.: Contributed to conceptualization, methodology, and supervision; M.K.: Was responsible for data curation, investigation and formal analysis; M.B.E.: Contributed to methodology, investigation, and writing of the original draft; E.Ş.: Was involved in visualization, resources, and writing-review and editing; H.K.: Contributed to software, validation, and supervision.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Financial Disclosure

The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.

Data Sharing Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

AI Disclosure

The authors declare that artificial intelligence (AI) tools were not used, or were used solely for language editing, and had no role in data analysis, interpretation, or the formulation of conclusions. All scientific content, data interpretation, and conclusions are the sole responsibility of the authors. The authors further confirm that AI tools were not used to generate, fabricate, or ‘hallucinate’ references, and that all references have been carefully verified for accuracy.

References

  1. Augat P, Bliven E, Hackl S. Biomechanics of femoral neck fractures and implications for fixation. J Orthop Trauma 2019;33:S27-32. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001365.
  2. Macaulay W, Yoon RS, Parsley B, Nellans KW, Teeny SM; DFACTO Consortium. Displaced femoral neck fractures: Is there a standard of care? Orthopedics 2007;30:748-9. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20070901-08.
  3. Kalsbeek JH, van Walsum ADP, Vroemen JPAM, Janzing HMJ, Winkelhorst JT, Bertelink BP, et al. Displaced femoral neck fractures in patients 60 years of age or younger: Results of internal fixation with the dynamic locking blade plate. Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:443-9. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B4.BJJ-2016-1098.R3.
  4. Bjørgul K, Reikerås O. Outcome of undisplaced and moderately displaced femoral neck fractures. Acta Orthop 2007;78:498-504. DOI: 10.1080/17453670710014149.
  5. Wang SH, Yang JJ, Shen HC, Lin LC, Lee MS, Pan RY. Using a modified Pauwels method to predict the outcome of femoral neck fracture in relatively young patients. Injury 2015;46:1969-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.06.016.
  6. Bartonícek J. Pauwels' classification of femoral neck fractures: Correct interpretation of the original. J Orthop Trauma 2001;15:358-60. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200106000-00009.
  7. Bout CA, Cannegieter DM, Juttmann JW. Percutaneous cannulated screw fixation of femoral neck fractures: The three point principle. Injury 1997;28:135-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(96)00161-1.
  8. Slobogean GP, Sprague SA, Scott T, Bhandari M. Complications following young femoral neck fractures. Injury 2015;46:484-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.10.010.
  9. Estrada LS, Volgas DA, Stannard JP, Alonso JE. Fixation failure in femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;(399):110-8. DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200206000-00013.
  10. Bhandari M, Swiontkowski M. Management of acute hip fracture. N Engl J Med 2017;377:2053-62. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMcp1611090.
  11. Slobogean GP, Sprague SA, Scott T, McKee M, Bhandari M. Management of young femoral neck fractures: Is there a consensus? Injury 2015;46:435-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.11.028.
  12. Ye Y, Hao J, Mauffrey C, Hammerberg EM, Stahel PF, Hak DJ. Optimizing stability in femoral neck fracture fixation. Orthopedics 2015;38:625-30. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20151002-05.
  13. Asnis SE, Wanek-Sgaglione L. Intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck. Results of cannulated screw fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76:1793-803. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199412000-00005.
  14. Aminian A, Gao F, Fedoriw WW, Zhang LQ, Kalainov DM, Merk BR. Vertically oriented femoral neck fractures: Mechanical analysis of four fixation techniques. J Orthop Trauma 2007;21:544-8. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31814b822e.
  15. Mir H, Collinge C. Application of a medial buttress plate may prevent many treatment failures seen after fixation of vertical femoral neck fractures in young adults. Med Hypotheses 2015;84:429-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2015.01.029.
  16. Ye Y, Chen K, Tian K, Li W, Mauffrey C, Hak DJ. Medial buttress plate augmentation of cannulated screw fixation in vertically unstable femoral neck fractures: Surgical technique and preliminary results. Injury 2017;48:2189-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.017.
  17. Schandelmaier P, Partenheimer A, Koenemann B, Grün OA, Krettek C. Distal femoral fractures and LISS stabilization. Injury 2001;32:SC55-63. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1383(01)00184-x.
  18. Nana AD, Joshi A, Lichtman DM. Plating of the distal radius. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005;13:159-71. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200505000-00003.
  19. Chen NC, Jupiter JB. Management of distal radial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:2051-62. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00020.
  20. Chan YS, Yuan LJ, Hung SS, Wang CJ, Yu SW, Chen CY, et al. Arthroscopic-assisted reduction with bilateral buttress plate fixation of complex tibial plateau fractures. Arthroscopy 2003;19:974-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2003.09.038.
  21. Li N, Cheng KY, Fan J, Li Y, Yang M, Zhu S, et al. Evaluating three internal fixation techniques for Pauwels III femoral neck fractures via finite element analysis. Sci Rep 2024;14:15519. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66638-1.
  22. Lee KJ, Ahn J, Kim CH. The effect of additional reduction screw fixation for basicervical femoral neck fracture: A finite element analysis. Hip Int 2026:11207000251401090. DOI: 10.1177/11207000251401090.
  23. Huang ED, Xue HH, Chen L, Feng Y, Zhao L, Zhong ZH, et al. Effect of three cannulated compression screws combined with an obstructing screw on the biomechanical performance of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: A finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2025;26:474. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08691-z.
  24. Özer A, Öner K, Okutan AE, Ayas MS. Comparative finite element analysis of four different internal fixation implants for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures in various fracture angles in the sagittal plane. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2022;33:352-8. DOI: 10.52312/jdrs.2022.676.
  25. Fan ZY, Shu LY, Jin YZ, Sherrier MC, Yin BH, Liu CJ, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of compression buttress screw and medial plate fixation for the treatment of vertical femoral neck fractures. Injury 2022;53:3887-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.09.056.
  26. Yildirim C, Demirel M, Karahan G, Cetinkaya E, Misir A, Yamak F, et al. Biomechanical comparison of four different fixation methods in the management of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: Is there a clear winner? Injury 2022;53:3124-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.06.029.
  27. Li J, Yin P, Zhang L, Chen H, Tang P. Medial anatomical buttress plate in treating displaced femoral neck fracture a finite element analysis. Injury 2019;50:1895-900. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.08.024.
  28. Giordano V, Alves DD, Paes RP, Amaral AB, Giordano M, Belangero W, et al. The role of the medial plate for Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture: A comparative mechanical study using two fixations with cannulated screws. J Exp Orthop 2019;6:18. DOI: 10.1186/s40634-019-0187-3.
  29. Zeng W, Liu Y, Hou X. Biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation implants for femoral neck fractures: A comparative finite element analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2020;196:105714. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105714.
  30. Jiang X, Liang K, Du G, Chen Y, Tang Y, Geng K. Biomechanical evaluation of different internal fixation methods based on finite element analysis for Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture. Injury 2022;53:3115-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.08.038.
  31. Gao Y, Ma T, Chang X, Jia P, Li X, Tang X. Femoral Neck System (FNS) versus 4 Cannulated Compression Screws (CCSs) in the treatment of young patients with Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture: A retrospective comparative study. J Orthop Surg Res 2025;20:65. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05461-4.
  32. Nan C, Li Y, Liu Y, Ma L, Ma Z. Biomechanical comparison of femoral neck system and cannulated screws coupled with medial plate for treating Pauwels III femoral neck fractures. Technol Health Care 2023;31:1161-70. DOI: 10.3233/THC-220267.
  33. Zhu Y, Wu S, Yan J, Wang W, Huang X, Zhang H. Finite element analysis of the femoral neck system for different placement positions in the fixation of Pauwels type Ⅲ femoral neck fractures. Injury 2025;56:112218. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2025.112218.
  34. Liu J, Li Z, Ding J, Huang B, Piao C. Biomechanical analysis of two medial buttress plate fixation methods to treat Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022;23:49. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05014-4.
  35. Augat P, Schorlemmer S. The role of cortical bone and its microstructure in bone strength. Age Ageing 2006;35:ii27- 31. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afl081.
  36. Muratoglu OG, Yildirim C, Ceylan H, Huvaj YN, Demirel M, Bozdağ SE. Bicortical screw placement and microdamage in medial buttress plates in the management of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: A scanning electron microscopybased analysis. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2026;37:209-17. DOI: 10.52312/jdrs.2026.2457.
  37. Zherebtsov S, Salishchev G, Galeyev R, Maekawa K. Mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy with submicrocrystalline structure produced by severe plastic deformation. Mater Trans 2005;46:2020-5.
  38. Tümer D, Güngörürler M, Havıtçıoğlu H, Arman Y. Investigation of effective coating of the Ti-6Al-4V alloy and 316L stainless steel with graphene or carbon nanotubes with finite element methods. J Mater Res Technol 2020;9:15880-93.
  39. Oken OF, Soydan Z, Yildirim AO, Gulcek M, Ozlu K, Ucaner A. Performance of modified anatomic plates is comparable to proximal femoral nail, dynamic hip screw and anatomic plates: Finite element and biomechanical testing. Injury 2011;42:1077-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.014.