Skip to main content
JDRS · Open access journal

Original Article · Open access

Comparison of tendon healing using local platelet-rich plasma, erythropoietin, and erythropoietin-bevacizumab in a rat Achilles tenotomy model

PDF Cite this article

Ahmet Emrah Açan

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Balıkesir University Faculty of Medicine, Balıkesir, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0001-7116-8773

Aslı Karakılıç

Department of Physiology, Balıkesir University, Faculty of Medicine, Balıkesir, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0001-7788-4949

Mert Emre Aydın

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Balıkesir University Faculty of Medicine, Balıkesir, Türkiye

ORCID: 0009-0006-6124-7842

Özgür Bulmuş

Department of Physiology, Balıkesir University, Faculty of Medicine, Balıkesir, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0001-7736-402X

Emrah Özcan

Department of Anatomy, Balıkesir University, Faculty of Medicine, Balıkesir, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0002-6373-4744

Gülay Turan

Department of Pathology, Balıkesir University, Faculty of Medicine, Balıkesir, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0002-3702-8811

Özge Özmen

Department of Pathology, Balıkesir University, Faculty of Medicine, Balıkesir, Türkiye

ORCID: 0009-0000-8474-7619

Reşit Buğra Hüsemoğlu

Department of Biomechanics, Dokuz Eylül University, Institute of Health Sciences, İzmir, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0003-1979-160X

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the effects of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), erythropoietin (EPO), and EPO-bevacizumab (EPO-BEVA) combination on tendon healing in a rat Achilles tenotomy model.

Materials and methods: Fifty-six male Wistar albino rats (14 to 16 weeks old) were randomly assigned to control, PRP, EPO, and EPO-BEVA groups including 14 rats in each group. Bilateral Achilles tenotomy was performed under anesthesia, followed by respective treatments. Platelet-rich plasma (0.1 mL/tendon) was prepared using a Ficoll-based extraction kit. The EPO (500 U/kg) and EPO-BEVA (175 U EPO + 1.25 mg BEVA) were administered locally. Biomechanical analysis assessed maximum force, stiffness, tensile stress, and Young’s modulus. Histological evaluation included Bonar scoring, collagen organization, tenocyte morphology, and vascularity. Cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured.

Results: At Week 2, the EPO-BEVA group exhibited superior stiffness (14.79±6.9 N/mm) than PRP (8.64±1.5 N/mm, p=0.015) and greater tensile stress (8.2±1 MPa) than control (6.16±1.3 MPa, p=0.031). The CSA was reduced (4.79±0.8 mm2) compared to EPO (6.56±1.1 mm2, p=0.038), indicating qualitative tendon improvements. Histological analysis showed enhanced matrix organization and reduced vascularity in the EPO-BEVA group, with lower Bonar scores (5.29±1.4 vs. 9.29±1.1 in control, p=0.002). By Week 4, maximum force remained higher in EPO-BEVA (46.67±5.8 N) than control (34.84±3 N, p=0.004), with sustained Young’s modulus superiority compared to EPO (3.2±1.2 MPa vs. 1.78±0.5 MPa, p=0.014), although the stiffness differences were no longer significant.

Conclusion: Our study results showed that EPO-BEVA enhanced tendon healing via vascular and matrix modulation, although the lack of a BEVA-only group limits conclusions on synergy. Future studies with larger sample sizes, including BEVA monotherapy, optimized dosing strategies, and long-term evaluations are needed to better clarify these effects and refine treatment strategies in regenerative medicine.

Declarations

Author Contributions

Research design, Material preparation, interpretation of data, drafting the paper: A.E.A.; Analysis and acquisition of data, drafting the paper: K.A.; Material preparation and acquisition of data: A.M.E.; Revising it critically: B.Ö.; Analysis and acquisition of data: Ö.E.; Acquisition of data: T.G.; Acquisition of data: Ö.Ö.; Acquisition of data: H.R.B.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Financial Disclosure

The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.

Acknowledgments

The statistics were performed by Prof. Sinan Saraçlı, Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Balıkesir University.

Data Sharing Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable reques