Skip to main content
JDRS · Open access journal
Joint Diseases and
Related Surgery
Online manuscript submissionSubmit a manuscript e-ISSN 2687-4792

Original Article · Open access

Effects of proximal fibular osteotomy on tibiofibular and medial knee loads in severe varus: A finite element study

PDF Cite this article

Oğuzhan Pekince

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0002-3988-9818

Ahmet Yıldırım

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0002-3953-091X

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the biomechanical effects of proximal fibular osteotomy (PFO) on tibiofemoral and proximal tibiofibular load transfer under simulated neutral and varus alignment conditions using a lower-extremity finite element analysis (FEA) model.

Materials and Methods: A patient-specific three-dimensional FEA model of the lower extremity was developed from computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging data of a healthy volunteer. Neutral, 3° varus, and 5° varus alignments were simulated before and after PFO under a simplified physiological axial load of 900 N. Tibiofemoral compartment forces, proximal tibiofibular joint (PTFJ) force, distal tibiotalar reaction force, and peak von Mises stresses within the cartilage-meniscus complex were evaluated.

Results: Proximal fibular osteotomy markedly reduced PTFJ force across all alignment conditions. Under neutral alignment, PTFJ force decreased from 122.94 N to 21.84 N, while distal tibiotalar reaction force increased from 787.55 N to 897.89 N, indicating redistribution of load through distal pathways. Tibiofemoral compartment forces changed minimally. Under 5° varus alignment, medial tibiofemoral force decreased only from 608.45 N to 603.78 N following PFO. Peak medial meniscal and cartilage stresses increased with varus alignment and remained largely unchanged after osteotomy.

Conclusion: In this single-subject static FEA model, PFO substantially reduced proximal tibiofibular loading, but produced only limited changes in tibiofemoral load distribution under simulated varus alignment. Within the present model, load redistribution occurred predominantly through distal load-transfer pathways rather than substantial unloading of the medial tibiofemoral compartment. These findings suggest that the biomechanical effect of PFO may primarily involve alteration of fibular load transmission rather than meaningful reduction of medial knee loading.

Declarations

Author Contributions

O.P.: Contributed to the study conception and design, supervised the study, and drafted the manuscript; A.Y.: Contributed to study design, manuscript drafting, and critical revision. Both authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Financial Disclosure

The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Musa Güngörürler for his valuable contributions to the development of the finite element model and technical support throughout the study.

Data Sharing Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

AI Disclosure

The authors declare that artificial intelligence (AI) tools were not used, or were used solely for language editing, and had no role in data analysis, interpretation, or the formulation of conclusions. All scientific content, data interpretation, and conclusions are the sole responsibility of the authors. The authors further confirm that AI tools were not used to generate, fabricate, or ‘hallucinate’ references, and that all references have been carefully verified for accuracy.

References

  1. Dong T, Chen W, Zhang F, Yin B, Tian Y, Zhang Y. Radiographic measures of settlement phenomenon in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2016;35:1573-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10067-015-3146-0.
  2. Wang X, Wei L, Lv Z, Zhao B, Duan Z, Wu W, et al. Proximal fibular osteotomy: A new surgery for pain relief and improvement of joint function in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Int Med Res 2017;45:282-9. DOI: 10.1177/0300060516676630.
  3. Yang ZY, Chen W, Li CX, Wang J, Shao DC, Hou ZY, et al. Medial compartment decompression by fibular osteotomy to treat medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: A pilot study. Orthopedics 2015;38:e1110-4. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20151120-08.
  4. Kang Y, Kim J, Sim JA, Moon M, Park JC, Cho SH, et al. Stress effect in the knee joint based on the fibular osteotomy level and varus deformity: A finite element analysis study. Bioengineering (Basel) 2023;10:1003. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering10091003.
  5. Morales-Avalos JE, Morales-Avalos R, Martínez-Guajardo KV, Perelli S, Monllau JC, Sánchez Egea AJ, et al. In-silico study of the biomechanical effects of proximal-fibular osteotomy on knee joint contact pressure in varus-valgus misalignment. Med Eng Phys 2024;129:104185. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2024.104185.
  6. Unal OK, Dagtas MZ, Demir C, Najafov T, Ugutmen E. The effects of proximal fibular osteotomy on the knee and ankle joints: A finite element analysis. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2021;88:313-20.
  7. Pan D, TianYe L, Peng Y, JingLi X, HongZhu L, HeRan Z, et al. Effects of proximal fibular osteotomy on stress changes in mild knee osteoarthritis with varus deformity: A finite element analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 2020;15:375. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01894-1.
  8. Ari B, Canlidinç M, Yaşar N, Gedik MA. In case effects of proximal fibular osteotomy and total knee arthroplasty on load distribution in the human knee: A comparative finite element study. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2026;37:180-9. DOI: 10.52312/jdrs.2026.2455.
  9. Marchetti DC, Moatshe G, Phelps BM, Dahl KD, Ferrari MB, Chahla J, et al. The proximal tibiofibular joint: A biomechanical analysis of the anterior and posterior ligamentous complexes. Am J Sports Med 2017;45:1888-92. DOI: 10.1177/0363546517697288.
  10. Sugianto JA, Hadipranata T, Lazarus G, Amrullah AH. Proximal fibular osteotomy for the management of medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee 2021;28:169-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.11.020.
  11. Zhai T, Jiang F, Feng W, Chen Z. Anatomy, biomechanics, and clinical advances of proximal tibiofibular joint in pain management. Front Surg 2025;12:1604538. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1604538.
  12. Daszkiewicz K, Łuczkiewicz P. Biomechanics of medial meniscus tears in the context of pain: A finite element analysis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2026;13:1693500. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1693500.
  13. Gultac E, Can Fİ, Hürriyet Aydoğan N. Proximal partial fibular resection versus high tibial osteotomy: Comparative outcomes in early-stage knee osteoarthritis. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2025;36:266-71. DOI: 10.52312/jdrs.2025.2107.
  14. Liu B, Chen W, Zhang Q, Yan X, Zhang F, Dong T, et al. Proximal fibular osteotomy to treat medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: Preoperational factors for short-term prognosis. PLoS One 2018;13:e0197980. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197980.
  15. Morales Avalos JE, Morales-Avalos R, Martínez-Guajardo KV, Pacheco-García LM, Perelli S, Monllau JC, et al. How effective is proximal fibular osteotomy in redistributing joint pressures? Insights from an HTO comparative in-silico study. J Orthop Surg Res 2024;19:333. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04807-8.
  16. Fu C, Wang F, Zhu Y, Li G, Yuwen P, Wu D, et al. Severe medial osteoarthritis predicts patient dissatisfaction after proximal fibular osteotomy: A mid- to long-term follow-up study. Int Orthop 2024;48:95-101. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-023-06036-w.
  17. Yapıcı F. High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO), Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA), and Proximal Fibular Osteotomy (PFO) for medial-compartment knee osteoarthritis: A narrative review of comparative mechanisms, clinical outcomes, and decision-making. J Clin Med 2025;14:7882. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14217882.