Skip to main content
JDRS · Open access journal

Original Article · Open access

Gerdy’s tubercle as a novel anatomical landmark for the proximal tibial cut in total knee arthroplasty

PDF Cite this article

Hamza Özer

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0001-5107-637X

Ferid Abdulaliyev

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0003-2153-1030

Niymet Pelin Cavdar Yilmaz

Department of Anatomy, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0002-9014-5638

Asim Ahmadov

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0002-9534-3131

Yigit Gungor

Department of Anatomy, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0002-9134-8066

Seda Nur Tosun

Department of Radiology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0003-0569-1480

Ayhan Comert

Department of Anatomy, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0002-9309-838X

Nil Tokgoz

Department of Anatomy, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0003-2812-1528

Mehmet Yilmaz

Department of Anatomy, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0001-8395-4675

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to explore the use of Gerdy’s tubercle (GT) as an innovative and dependable anatomical landmark for the proximal tibial cut in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in cases with extensive knee degeneration.

Materials and methods: One hundred dry tibia bones and 10 formalin-fixed cadaveric knee specimens of both sexes were examined. A Zimmer NexGen tibial cutting guide and a Mitutoyo digital caliper were utilized to align the guide with the tibia's mechanical axis. The procedure was replicated on cadaver knees using a standardized medial parapatellar arthrotomy approach. Measurements included the distance from GT superior border to the resection line and the length of the tibia. A radiological study involving magnetic resonance imaging examinations of 48 patients, which were evaluated focusing on the upper border of GT and the least degenerated segment of the posterolateral part of the lateral tibial condyle, was conducted.

Results: Anatomical measurements of GT and proximal tibial areas in 110 specimens showed slight but consistent variations with cadaver measurements. Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of 48 patients revealed notable sex differences in the distance between the superior border of GT and the tibia's posterolateral surface. There was also a significant negative correlation between the distance from GT to the posterolateral corner and cartilage thickness.

Conclusion: Proper alignment in TKA is crucial for success, but identifying an extra-articular landmark for horizontal tibial resection remains challenging, particularly in severely arthritic knees. This study introduces GT as a novel anatomical landmark for TKA, offering a more reliable reference for achieving desired joint levels in knees with significant degenerative changes.

Declarations

Ethics Committee Approval

The study protocol was approved by the Gazi University Clinical Research Ethics Committee (date: 22.05.2023, no: 437). The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the study, provided research supervision, and critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content: H.Ö.; Participated in the study design, was involved in data collection and processing, conducted the literature review, wrote the initial draft of the manuscript, and contributed to subsequent revisions: F.A., A.A.; Assisted in designing the study, collected and processed data, reviewed the relevant literature, and contributed to writing and revising the manuscript: N.P.C.Y.; Helped in the study design, was responsible for data collection and processing, analyzed and interpreted the data, reviewed the literature, and participated in writing the manuscript, also contributed to the critical revision of the manuscript: A.A.; Oversaw the study control and supervision, and was involved in sourcing the materials necessary for the research: A.C.; Critically reviewed the manuscript to enhance its intellectual content and provided necessary materials for the study. NT and SNT were additionally responsible for performing the radiological measurements and handling the related data: Y.G., N.T., M.Y.; Also contributed to the radiological data collection and analysis: S.N.T.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Financial Disclosure

The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was not supported by grant funding. The authors sincerely thank those who donated their bodies to science so that anatomical research could be performed.

Data Sharing Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Ozer H, Baymurat AC, Ahmadov A, Selek HY, Abdulaliyev F, Ozel T. Does medullary diameter to stem width ratio and stem length affect outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasties? A case series. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2024;35:244-8. DOI: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.1108.
  2. Clement ND, Bardgett M, Weir D, Holland J, Gerrand C, Deehan DJ. Three groups of dissatisfied patients exist after total knee arthroplasty: early, persistent, and late. Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:161-169. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B2.BJJ2017-1016.R1.
  3. Stotter C, Reiter E, Schretter W, Reuter P, Nehrer S, Klestil T. Influence of the femoral entry point for intramedullary alignment in total knee arthroplasty: A computer-aided design approach. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2022;33:294-302. DOI: 10.52312/jdrs.2022.645.
  4. Oussedik S, Abdel MP, Victor J, Pagnano MW, Haddad FS. Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2020;102- B:276-9. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B3.BJJ-2019-1729.
  5. Tandogan RN, Kort NP, Ercin E, van Rooij F, Nover L, Saffarini M, et al. Computer-assisted surgery and patient-specific instrumentation improve the accuracy of tibial baseplate rotation in total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional instrumentation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2022;30:2654-65. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06495-x.
  6. Tao K, Cai M, Zhu Y, Lou L, Cai Z. Aligning the tibial component with medial border of the tibial tubercle- -is it always right? Knee 2014;21:295-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2012.06.007.
  7. Lee JK, Choi CH. Total knee arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. Knee Surg Relat Res 2012;24:1-6. DOI: 10.5792/ksrr.2012.24.1.1.
  8. Dorr LD, Boiardo RA. Technical considerations in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;205:5-11.
  9. Donegan DJ, Seigerman DA, Yoon RS, Liporace FA. Gerdy's tubercle: The lighthouse to the knee. J Orthop Trauma 2015;29:e51-3. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000196.
  10. Kowalczuk M, Herbst E, Burnham JM, Albers M, Musahl V, Fu FH. A layered anatomic description of the anterolateral complex of the knee. Clin Sports Med 2018;37:1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2017.07.001.
  11. Kalra S, Singh P, Khandelwal A. Variations of Gerdy's tubercle, proposal of a morphological classification: Anatomical study and its clinical importance. Journal of Morphological Sciences 2014;31:110-3. DOI: 10.4322/jms.068014.
  12. Rubel IF, Schwarzbard I, Leonard A, Cece D. Anatomic location of the peroneal nerve at the level of the proximal aspect of the tibia: Gerdy's safe zone. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:1625-8. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200408000-00004.
  13. Wang PC, Ren D, Zhou B. Surgical technique of anterolateral approach for tibial plateau fracture. Orthop Surg 2015;7:368- 70. DOI: 10.1111/os.12205.
  14. Akdemir Aktaş H, Ülkir M, Günenç Beşer C, Demiryürek D. Reappraisal of the proximal tibia anatomy in Turkish population. Surg Radiol Anat 2023;45:263-70. DOI: 10.1007/s00276-023-03094-y.
  15. Cheng W, Li Z, Zhang J, Cao Q, Yu H, Qi L, et al. A lateral parapatellar approach with iliotibial band dissection from the Gerdy tubercle for total knee arthroplasty of the valgus knee. Exp Ther Med 2021;21:38. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2020.9470.
  16. Mahmood FF, Holloway NJ, Deakin AH, Clarke JV, Picard F. A new landmark for measuring tibial component rotation after total knee arthroplasty. Knee 2019;26:779-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.09.002.
  17. Nam JH, Koh YG, Kang K, Park JH, Kang KT. The posterior cortical axis as an alternative reference for femoral component placement in total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res 2020;15:603. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-02146-y.
  18. Nishikawa K, Mizu-uchi H, Okazaki K, Matsuda S, Tashiro Y, Iwamoto Y. Accuracy of proximal tibial bone cut using anterior border of tibia as bony landmark in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015;30:2121-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.055.
  19. Atik OŞ. Writing for Joint Diseases and Related Surgery (JDRS): There is something new and interesting in this article! Jt Dis Relat Surg 2023;34:533. DOI: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.57916.
  20. Tsukeoka T, Tsuneizumi Y, Yoshino K, Suzuki M. Caserelated factors affecting cutting errors of the proximal tibia in total knee arthroplasty assessed by computer navigation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018;26:1493-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4397-2.