Skip to main content
JDRS · Open access journal
Joint Diseases and
Related Surgery
Online manuscript submissionSubmit a manuscript e-ISSN 2687-4792

Original Article · Open access

The medial cortical ratio as a risk factor for failure after surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients

PDF Cite this article

Ateş Mahmuti

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Başkent University Istanbul Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0002-4106-8429

Ekin Kaya Şimşek

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0003-3438-1633

Bahtiyar Haberal

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Türkiye

ORCID: 0000-0002-1668-6997

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to investigate whether the medial cortical ratio (MCR) is associated with fixation failure in patients undergoing plate-screw fixation due to proximal humeral fracture.

Patients and methods: Between May 2011 and October 2020, a total of 93 patients (25 males, 68 females; mean age: 74.2±5.3 years; range, 65 to 92 years) who were operated for a proximal humeral fracture were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups during follow-up: patients with fixation failure (n=18) and patients with intact fixation (n=75). After radiological analysis, the MCR and fracture type were recorded. The effects of MCR and fracture type on the development of failure were evaluated.

Results: The mean follow-up was 41.3±4.7 (range, 18 to 66) months. There was no significant correlation between fixation failure and MCR in either group (p=0.535). However, the risk of fixation failure increased by seven-fold in patients with MCR greater than 0.09 compared to the other patients. In addition, the fracture type was significantly more severe in the failed fixation group than the intact fixation group (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients still remains a challenge for surgeons due to the high failure rate. In elderly patients scheduled for surgery to treat a proximal humerus fracture, a reverse shoulder arthroplasty may be a reasonable choice to avoid reoperation due to fixation failure in elderly with three-part or more fragmented fractures and high MCR.

Declarations

Ethics Committee Approval

The study protocol was approved by the Başkent University Medical and Health Sciences Research Board (date: 30.11.2021, no: KA21/466). The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Author Contributions

Idea and concept, data collection and processing, literature review, writing the article: A.M.; Study design, data collection, writing the article, materials: E.K.Ş.; Control and supervision, critical review, references and fundings: B.H.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.

Financial Disclosure

The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.

Patient Consent for Publication

A written informed consent was obtained from each patient.

Data Sharing Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Wallace MJ, Bledsoe G, Moed BR, Israel HA, Kaar SG. Relationship of cortical thickness of the proximal humerus and pullout strength of a locked plate and screw construct. J Orthop Trauma 2012;26:222-5. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31822421f7.
  2. Murray IR, Amin AK, White TO, Robinson CM. Proximal humeral fractures: Current concepts in classification, treatment and outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2011;93:1-11. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B1.25702.
  3. Adıyeke L, Geçer A, Bulut O. Comparison of effective factors in loss of reduction after locking plate-screw treatment in humerus proximal fractures. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2022;28:1008-15. DOI: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.28742.
  4. Panagiotopoulou VC, Varga P, Richards RG, Gueorguiev B, Giannoudis PV. Late screw-related complications in locking plating of proximal humerus fractures: A systematic review. Injury 2019;50:2176-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.11.002.
  5. Barnett E, Nordin BE. The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: A new approach. Clin Radiol 1960;11:166-74. DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(60)80012-8.
  6. Virtama P, Telkka A. Cortical thickness as an estimate of mineral content of human humerous and femur. Br J Radiol 1962;35:632-3. DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-35-417-632.
  7. Mather J, MacDermid JC, Faber KJ, Athwal GS. Proximal humerus cortical bone thickness correlates with bone mineral density and can clinically rule out osteoporosis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013;22:732-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.08.018.
  8. Skedros JG, Knight AN, Pitts TC, O'Rourke PJ, Burkhead WZ. Radiographic morphometry and densitometry predict strength of cadaveric proximal humeri more reliably than age and DXA scan density. J Orthop Res 2016;34:331-41. DOI: 10.1002/jor.22994.
  9. Newton AW, Selvaratnam V, Pydah SK, Nixon MF. Simple radiographic assessment of bone quality is associated with loss of surgical fixation in patients with proximal humeral fractures. Injury 2016;47:904-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.12.029.
  10. Krappinger D, Bizzotto N, Riedmann S, Kammerlander C, Hengg C, Kralinger FS. Predicting failure after surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Injury 2011;42:1283- 8. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.01.017.
  11. Schumaier A, Grawe B. Proximal humerus fractures: Evaluation and management in the elderly patient. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2018;9:2151458517750516. DOI: 10.1177/2151458517750516.
  12. von Rüden C, Augat P. Failure of fracture fixation in osteoporotic bone. Injury 2016;47 Suppl 2:S3-10. DOI: 10.1016/S0020-1383(16)47002-6.
  13. Hepp P, Theopold J, Osterhoff G, Marquass B, Voigt C, Josten C. Bone quality measured by the radiogrammetric parameter “cortical index” and reoperations after locking plate osteosynthesis in patients sustaining proximal humerus fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009;129:1251- 9. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-009-0889-6.
  14. Baumgärtner R, Heeren N, Quast D, Babst R, Brunner A. Is the cortical thickness index a valid parameter to assess bone mineral density in geriatric patients with hip fractures? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2015;135:805-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-015-2202-1.
  15. He QF, Sun H, Shu LY, Zhu Y, Xie XT, Zhan Y, et al. Radiographic predictors for bone mineral loss: Cortical thickness and index of the distal femur. Bone Joint Res 2018;7:468-75. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.77.BJR-2017-0332.R1.
  16. Patterson J, Rungprai C, Den Hartog T, Gao Y, Amendola A, Phisitkul P, et al. Cortical bone thickness of the distal part of the tibia predicts bone mineral density. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016;98:751-60. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.15.00795.
  17. Rodríguez-Soto AE, Fritscher KD, Schuler B, Issever AS, Roth T, Kamelger F, et al. Texture analysis, bone mineral density, and cortical thickness of the proximal femur: Fracture risk prediction. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010;34:949-57. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181ec05e4.
  18. Sah AP, Thornhill TS, LeBoff MS, Glowacki J. Correlation of plain radiographic indices of the hip with quantitative bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int 2007;18:1119-26. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-007-0348-6.
  19. Schmidutz F, Schopf C, Yan SG, Ahrend MD, Ihle C, Sprecher C. Cortical bone thickness of the distal radius predicts the local bone mineral density. Bone Joint Res 2021;10:820-9. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.1012.BJR-2020-0271.R1.
  20. Spross C, Kaestle N, Benninger E, Fornaro J, Erhardt J, Zdravkovic V, et al. Deltoid Tuberosity Index: A simple radiographic tool to assess local bone quality in proximal humerus fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015;473:3038-45. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-015-4322-x.
  21. Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, von Stechow D, Zurakowski D, Warner JJ. The cortical thickness of the proximal humeral diaphysis predicts bone mineral density of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2003;85:611-7. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.85b4.12843.
  22. Webber T, Patel SP, Pensak M, Fajolu O, Rozental TD, Wolf JM. Correlation between distal radial cortical thickness and bone mineral density. J Hand Surg Am 2015;40:493-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.12.015.
  23. Yoshii I, Sawada N, Chijiwa T, Kokei S. Usefulness of cortical thickness ratio of the third metacarpal bone for prediction of major osteoporotic fractures. Bone Rep 2021;16:101162. DOI: 10.1016/j.bonr.2021.101162.
  24. Skedros JG, Mears CS, Burkhead WZ. Ultimate fracture load of cadaver proximal humeri correlates more strongly with mean combined cortical thickness than with areal cortical index, DEXA density, or canal-to-calcar ratio. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:1-7. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.61.BJR2016-0145.R1.
  25. Atik OŞ. Which articles do the editors prefer to publish? Jt Dis Relat Surg 2022;33:1-2. DOI: 10.52312/jdrs.2022.57903.
  26. Alrabaa RG, Ma G, Truong NM, Lansdown DA, Feeley BT, Zhang AL, et al. Trends in surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures and analysis of postoperative complications over a decade in 384,158 patients. JB JS Open Access 2022;7:e22.00008. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00008.
  27. Barlow JD, Logli AL, Steinmann SP, Sems SA, Cross WW, Yuan BJ, et al. Locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures in patients older than 60 years continues to be associated with a high complication rate. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020;29:1689-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.11.026.
  28. Solberg BD, Moon CN, Franco DP, Paiement GD. Locked plating of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in older patients: The effect of initial fracture pattern on outcome. J Orthop Trauma 2009;23:113-9. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31819344bf.