Original Article · Open access
Unilateral open-door laminoplasty alone with and without foraminoplasty for the treatment of mixed cervical spondylosis
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of unilateral open-door laminoplasty with adjunctive foraminoplasty in the management of mixed cervical spondylosis.
Patients and methods: Between January 2016 and January 2024, a total of 60 patients (36 males, 24 females; mean age: 71.8 ± 9.9 years; range, 52 to 92 years) who were diagnosed with mixed cervical spondylosis and underwent unilateral open-door laminoplasty were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups: Group A (n = 30) received laminoplasty alone and Group B (n = 30) underwent laminoplasty combined with foraminoplasty. Demographic data, perioperative outcomes, clinical efficacy, and complication rates were compared between the two groups.
Results: Group A showed significantly shorter operative time and reduced intraoperative blood loss compared to Group B (p < 0.001). Both groups exhibited significant improvements over time in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for neck and upper limb pain (p < 0.05) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores (p < 0.05). At the final follow-up, Group B demonstrated superior JOA scores and lower VAS scores for both neck and upper limb pain relative to Group A (p < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative C5 nerve root palsy and persistent upper limb radicular pain was significantly higher in Group A than in Group B (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: For patients with mixed cervical spondylosis, combining unilateral open-door laminoplasty with foraminoplasty provides effective concurrent decompression of the spinal cord and nerve roots, resulting in a significant symptomatic improvement in both myelopathic and radicular manifestations with a reduced risk of certain postoperative neurological complications.
* These authors contributed equally to this work.
Declarations
Author Contributions
Y.A.R., Y.X.P.: Conception and design; Y.Y., R.H.T., Y.L.K.: Collection and assembly of data; Y.A.R., Y.X.P., C.J.D.: Analysis and interpretation of the data; Y.A.R., Y.X.P.: Drafting of the article; C.J.D.: Statistical expertise; Y.A.R.: Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
Financial Disclosure
The authors received no financial support for the research and/or authorship of this article.
Data Sharing Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
AI Disclosure
The authors declare that artificial intelligence (AI) tools were not used, or were used solely for language editing, and had no role in data analysis, interpretation, or the formulation of conclusions. All scientific content, data interpretation, and conclusions are the sole responsibility of the authors. The authors further confirm that AI tools were not used to generate, fabricate, or ‘hallucinate’ references, and that all references have been carefully verified for accuracy.
References
- Theodore N. Degenerative cervical spondylosis. N Engl J Med 2020;383:159-68. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra2003558.
- Zhang LY, Yuan GH. Therapeutic effect of modified cervical Jiaji acupuncture on mixed type cervical spondylosis. Am J Transl Res 2024;16:3355-65. DOI: 10.62347/OEOL5448.
- Yang Y, Wang F. Hidden blood loss in unilateral open-door cervical laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2024;35:293-8. DOI: 10.52312/jdrs.2024.1439.
- Iwasaki M, Kawaguchi Y, Kimura T, Yonenobu K. Longterm results of expansive laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: More than 10 years follow up. J Neurosurg 2002;96:180-9.
- Burkhardt BW, Brielmaier M, Schwerdtfeger K, Sharif S, Oertel JM. Smith-Robinson procedure with and without Caspar plating as a treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A 26-year follow-up of 23 patients. Eur Spine J 2017;26:1246-53. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-4988-8.
- Youn MS, Shon MH, Seong YJ, Shin JK, Goh TS, Lee JS. Clinical and radiological outcomes of two-level endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy. Eur Spine J 2017;26:2450-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5017-7.
- Chang CJ, Liu YF, Hsiao YM, Huang YH, Liu KC, Lin RM, et al. Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus artificial disc replacement for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 2022;37:569-78. DOI: 10.3171/2022.2.SPINE211500.
- Park JB, Lee GW. Choosing the right treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2025;66:103014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103014.
- Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y, Ishii T, Yoshikawa H. C5 palsy after decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy: Review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003;28:2447- 51. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000090833.96168.3F.
- Tang Y, Zhou S, Wang Z, Huang W, Jia L, Chen X. Choice of the open side in unilateral open-door laminoplasty for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2020;45:741-6. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003378.
- Phan K, Scherman DB, Xu J, Leung V, Virk S, Mobbs RJ. Laminectomy and fusion vs laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Eur Spine J 2017;26:94-103. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4671-5.
- Tanaka N, Fujimoto Y, An HS, Ikuta Y, Yasuda M. The anatomic relation among the nerve roots, intervertebral foramina, and intervertebral discs of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:286-91. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200002010-00005.
- Lee DH, Cho JH, Hwang CJ, Lee CS, Kim C, Ha JK. Multilevel posterior foraminotomy with laminoplasty versus laminoplasty alone for cervical spondylotic myelopathy with radiculopathy: A comparative study. Spine J 2018;18:414-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.222.
- Komagata M, Nishiyama M, Endo K, Ikegami H, Tanaka S, Imakiire A. Prophylaxis of C5 palsy after cervical expansive laminoplasty by bilateral partial foraminotomy. Spine J 2004;4:650-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.03.022.
- Imagama S, Matsuyama Y, Yukawa Y, Kawakami N, Kamiya M, Kanemura T, et al. C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty: A multicentre study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010;92:393-400. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.92B3.22786.
- Chiba K, Toyama Y, Matsumoto M, Maruiwa H, Watanabe M, Hirabayashi K. Segmental motor paralysis after expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:2108-15. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200210010-00006.
- Bydon M, Macki M, Kaloostian P, Sciubba DM, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL, et al. Incidence and prognostic factors of c5 palsy: A clinical study of 1001 cases and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 2014;74:595-604. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000322.
- Tsuji T, Matsumoto M, Nakamura M, Ishii K, Fujita N, Chiba K, et al. Factors associated with postoperative C5 palsy after expansive open-door laminoplasty: Retrospective cohort study using multivariable analysis. Eur Spine J 2017;26:2410-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5223-3.
- Nakajima H, Kuroda H, Watanabe S, Honjoh K, Matsumine A. Risk factors and preventive measures for C5 palsy after cervical open-door laminoplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 2019;32:592-9. DOI: 10.3171/2019.10.SPINE19993.
- Chang JC, Park HK, Choi SK. Posterior cervical inclinatory foraminotomy for spondylotic radiculopathy preliminary. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2011;49:308-13. DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2011.49.5.308.
